More signals do not automatically create more clarity during a time-sensitive workflow.
Earlier insight. Smarter prioritization. Better sepsis response.
SEPTR helps care teams move from a crowded field of alerts toward a clearer view of which patients may need attention first—and why.
Retrospective validation complete. Advancing external and prospective evaluation.

Ranked risk, recent vitals, location, and care context remain visible in one clinical view.
Sepsis is not only a detection problem. It is a prioritization problem.
Teams already manage signals from many sources. The harder question is how to interpret changing risk across a full patient population without losing the context needed for action.
A patient’s position can shift as physiology, documentation, and available data change.
Teams need concise reasons to investigate—not another disconnected score.
A decision-support experience built around three essential jobs.
SEPTR brings together patient-level risk signals and workflow context in a ranked interface designed to support clinical review. It is intended to strengthen—not replace—professional judgment.
Recognition
Surface patterns that may warrant a closer look as available information changes.
Prioritization
Organize attention around a dynamic, patient-level view of relative urgency.
Clinical context
Keep supporting indicators visible so teams can review the reason behind a rank.
From changing data to a focused clinical review.
Observe
Available clinical data enters the decision-support workflow.
Assess
Patient-level patterns are evaluated as information changes.
Prioritize
The patient list is organized to support attention management.
Review
Clinicians inspect context and follow their established care protocols.
A shared view of who may need attention—and the context behind it.
The interface keeps priority rank, patient identifiers, score, last-vital timing, location, vital signs, and care ownership in one scan-friendly view.

Focus attention across a full care population.
Review supporting observations without leaving the queue.
Search, filter, and sort for the task at hand.
Validation is a process, not a finish line.
We evaluate both technical performance and clinical usefulness, with attention to calibration, false positives, lead time, missingness, performance over time, and workflow utility.
Retrospective validation
Initial retrospective evaluation has been completed.
External validation
We are pursuing evaluation across additional data and care settings.
Prospective evaluation
Prospective study design will examine real-world workflow utility and performance.
Designed for the realities of care delivery.
SEPTR’s value is grounded in helping the right people form a clearer shared picture during a demanding clinical workflow.
Attention management
Support review across many patients without flattening urgency into a single alert stream.
Shared situational awareness
Give clinical and operational teams a common, current view of patient priority.
Evaluation-ready thinking
Frame adoption around measurable workflow questions and transparent evidence development.
