Clinical decision support for the time-critical window

Earlier insight. Smarter prioritization. Better sepsis response.

SEPTR helps care teams move from a crowded field of alerts toward a clearer view of which patients may need attention first—and why.

Retrospective validation complete. Advancing external and prospective evaluation.

SEPTR patient priority dashboard showing ranked patients and clinical context
Designed around prioritization

Ranked risk, recent vitals, location, and care context remain visible in one clinical view.

The operational challenge

Sepsis is not only a detection problem. It is a prioritization problem.

Teams already manage signals from many sources. The harder question is how to interpret changing risk across a full patient population without losing the context needed for action.

Signal volumeAlerts compete for finite attention.

More signals do not automatically create more clarity during a time-sensitive workflow.

Clinical changeRisk is dynamic, not a snapshot.

A patient’s position can shift as physiology, documentation, and available data change.

Workflow realityContext determines what comes next.

Teams need concise reasons to investigate—not another disconnected score.

The SEPTR approach

A decision-support experience built around three essential jobs.

SEPTR brings together patient-level risk signals and workflow context in a ranked interface designed to support clinical review. It is intended to strengthen—not replace—professional judgment.

01

Recognition

Surface patterns that may warrant a closer look as available information changes.

02

Prioritization

Organize attention around a dynamic, patient-level view of relative urgency.

03

Clinical context

Keep supporting indicators visible so teams can review the reason behind a rank.

How it works

From changing data to a focused clinical review.

Observe

Available clinical data enters the decision-support workflow.

Assess

Patient-level patterns are evaluated as information changes.

Prioritize

The patient list is organized to support attention management.

Review

Clinicians inspect context and follow their established care protocols.

Product walkthrough

A shared view of who may need attention—and the context behind it.

The interface keeps priority rank, patient identifiers, score, last-vital timing, location, vital signs, and care ownership in one scan-friendly view.

Full SEPTR patient priority dashboard interface
Ranked patient list

Focus attention across a full care population.

Visible clinical context

Review supporting observations without leaving the queue.

Workflow controls

Search, filter, and sort for the task at hand.

Evidence pathway

Validation is a process, not a finish line.

We evaluate both technical performance and clinical usefulness, with attention to calibration, false positives, lead time, missingness, performance over time, and workflow utility.

Complete

Retrospective validation

Initial retrospective evaluation has been completed.

Advancing

External validation

We are pursuing evaluation across additional data and care settings.

Pathway

Prospective evaluation

Prospective study design will examine real-world workflow utility and performance.

Hospital value

Designed for the realities of care delivery.

SEPTR’s value is grounded in helping the right people form a clearer shared picture during a demanding clinical workflow.

01

Attention management

Support review across many patients without flattening urgency into a single alert stream.

02

Shared situational awareness

Give clinical and operational teams a common, current view of patient priority.

03

Evaluation-ready thinking

Frame adoption around measurable workflow questions and transparent evidence development.

See how SEPTR reframes the patient-prioritization workflow.